t institutions in oprichnin$®. But when prof. Platonov cited an earlier order, namely from 1569, where the honor is called a quarter order without the addition of the term “domestic,” and prof. Dyakonov found an indication of the honor under the name of the Quarter Hut
AE | V. and | under 1561-62, i.e., before the official establishment of the oprichz. Vienna minina, all the guess of prof. Seredonina on the emergence of quarters in | _ T
oprichnin$ was undermined t). _ oh [9 <
Seredonin's scheme retained only its main advantage, that it very sensitively took the starting point - in the administrative
> o \) g o E ‚ nistrative reforms of Grozny. (Platonov Orc. next page). G EAO
U. Platonov. The quarter order, as a special cash desk in the departments of Raz-G | line Order.
The documentary basis for this guess was given by Prof. Platonov. He did not start with the reason for the appearance of the Fourth Order or N
children, and with the establishment of a goal/establishment of them. |
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
not } thoroughly noticed by N.D. Chechulin and confirmed tg. Milyuiya” youkov and Seredonin, that in Cheti’ the income went, the local estate -%L and:
The nature of the different types of quitrent money for, “namestnic income”; the world and for awarding t E the same time, the salaries that were issued from the Quarters to serving people, “as this” time is indicated, were called quitrent. Therefore, one can imagine the situation in such a way that it will be assigned. The couple was given the quitrent in No. 8 m r ry | # my r) Platonov. Orize16 p. 174; M. Dyakonov. About the Moscow reforms of the half of the 10th century. Journal. M.N. Pr. 1891 book; 4, pp. 196, 197.: E |2) This was appointed by the Chetey’ well, it was already known to Mr. Otorozhev, eat;. Journal. Min. Nar. Prosv. 1393, book. 1. On the issue of quarters. About direct financial dependence on Moscow was also said by Lokhvitsy. See above,
to the population: They collect a quarter of their income... Absolutely oh 9 No. | |
r ti dene pakim5-servilyma lodyamz, Yum na’ ni2t5 ‘#ravo. It remains to find out what kind of rent money this is and who has the right to it? In response to the questions raised, ‘Prof. Platonov ubta- L A i. 1) iduiyya ve Cheti “tips” day “receive money for your succession” and so on. there is something else, ‘like “normal okuto”, “0brishi uch EN
[7— rokyo “, established ulozhbeneme 7064 (1555-1556 m.) ‘85 vide ransom” for the disgraced ‘feeding’;: 2) ‘the right to’ this I. was received by those who previously had the right’ to feeding.
S. Thus, the ‘question’ of why and ‘for m 4) >’ “his Cheti arose is completely destroyed, but it remains open how they arose, that is, what form they received initially and what place they took in the Moscow administrative system. //0%. Platonov and you are saying that the “quarter income, according to its origin”, was assigned.
and their service, and remuneration for it in the administrative forks, i.e., with feedings, were subject to the rise of the Rank or, more precisely, the Boyar Duma; Who gave them through Discharge; When feedings were replaced by gatherings in the Quarter, the supervision of the gatherings and Quarters of everything should have been concentrated in the same hands, in the Discharge, and not another order.”
Thus, according to Prof. Platonova v5 60 and 70 south-_
a › 0425 Quarterly order, as a special cash desk, in which it is concentrated: Se [What were certain fees and certain district expenses, 95! dyaka. At 80.
“No way at 5 a.m. mstv,” the clerk’s thoughts discharged. In the 80s, the Quarter Order lost its unity and finally disintegrated into Quarters, because it entered the offices of several Duma clerks. In this situation we found Quarter Fletcher 1).
Riviera
UP. Dyakonov. The Quarters were separated from the Treasurers department.
For completeness of the histographic review, the opinions expressed
On the question of the origin of the Quarters, it remains for us to point out.
look prof. Dyakonova. The connection between the origin of the Quarters and the zemstvo reform of Grozny, so thoroughly developed in the exposition of prof.
*) Platonov. Oriz. With. etr. 171-173, 181, 182.
row Feeders and their descendants, the top layer of service people,
and s.
Platonova, met her ‘complete’. ‘confirmed!e, and, in. become Mr. Lyakonova, ‘as’ ‘as’ was’ mastered. Comrade Lashpo-Danilevsky. in it! preface! and to. "The fed 'books. Kostroma Cheti 1613 - 16297 1" 1).