128) Ipat. 210, as well as 419 and all teachings. Monom. In the list of cities - among Lithuanian ones. His position was also indicated by Artsybashev, 1, 83, approx. 193. The city is surrounded by several ancient settlements connected by various legends: Tyshkevich, Orizate Ro\u. VoguzousTech, r. 183-4, from which Shpilevsky also borrowed, without indicating the source (Traveling around Polfsyu and Belarus, Contemporary 1854, vol. HT, pp. 51, 52).
129) In teaching Monomakha, Laurus. Lt. See Artsybyshev, T, r. 33, note. To the list of cities in Lithuania. The city also has a lake of the same name, near which it stands, and there are traces of ancient fortifications. Shpilevsky, Sovrem. 1854, t. HT, p. 49.
130) Ipat. 117, 185, 205; instructive Mon. to Laurel. Lt. Shpilev, who generally loves to go into discussions about the beginnings of the torods, attribute the construction of it to the strongman-witch doctor-Mönesk, known according to mythical legends. Travel., Sovrem., 1854 vol., vol. HG, p. 8, 06b of the history of Minsk, a monograph was written by the famous Syrokomlya, Kgoshka paza Mitzka in Tele\1-1ezkie}, 1857 No. 1; It's a pity we couldn't get this work. Interesting article about German in J. Min. Ext. D., 1843, part Br. 391 et seq. in the article “Over-Western Region of the Empire”. In the beginning, in 1890, Mr. Slupsky published a number of articles about Minsk and its evils in the “Minsk Listk”. See also about Minsk: Zulesyuyu, Oriz. Zeat. R., r. 231 and Va-Niz, Eeatoi. Rozka, $. Sh, r. 814 et seq.
131) Artsybyshev, |, r. 25, approx., Karamzvin, t. P, approx. 118, p. 48, Tatishchev, 9:
92 M. DOVNAR-ZAPOLSETI.
Nevolin think that N%mizu should look for the sfvernfe of Minsk and point to Nemonitsa near Borosov and Nemoika near Sfno 1). Barsov in his Ist.-Geogr. The dictionary indicates N%mezh (Noeshtey), a village in the Vilna province. and u., 10 versts from Vilna, which Balinsy pointed out even earlier 133). But the same Barsov in “Essays on the River Historical Geography” recognizes the N'miza stream, located in Minsk itself, 13%), this stream was first pointed out by Khodakovsy 135), but despite the similarity of names, they did not recognize the chronicle N'miza in it. Indeed, the similarity of the names in the chronicles of N'miza and the stream in Minsk is very tempting, but it is difficult to identify both of these names, unless one assumes that this stream in ancient times was BolBe or Menfe a decent river; Currently, from N$miza to Minsk® there is almost only one name left. Between the two, the record says this: The Izyaslavichs took Minsk “and went to Nemiz; and Vseslav went against”; On March 3, Vseslav was struck and fled. The Izyaslavichs were content with this, moved from here, obviously, to Dnfpr and stood “on Rshi near Smolensk,” as the photoscript puts it. Already in the shul they lured Vseslav to themselves: “he, having embraced the flowering of the cross, crossed into the boats across the Dnpr” 136), therefore, they stood behind the Dnsprom, on the Smolensk side, and Vseslav negotiated from this side of the Dnpr. The Ifvet “Tales of Igor’s Campaign” speaks about this same N%miz$ and the bloody battle that took place on it: (Vseslav) galloped off to Nemiza from Dudutok. On the Nemiz, lay sheaves with your heads, thresh the chaps: haraluzhny, put your belly on the totsf, beat the soul from the body. NemizIn the blood of the breez, don’t swear by the bologom, scatter the bones of the Russian sons." From the given fragment of the chronicle it is clear: if N%miza was in Minsk, then the Izyaslivichs would already be on it and they would not need to go to NЪMiz; since the current N′′Miza is located in the center of old Minsk, then
132) Pogodin, GU, r. 805—806. It was repeated by Turchinowicz, „Obozr. ist. Bflor.“, r. 257—8. 33) Bfagoi. Ro]zKa, Sh, b. 213.
134) r. 185. 135) Russian. Istorič, 06., t. T, r. 38.136) Ipat. 117.
EGINNING. XSh St. 0583.