2) The document was first used in the books of Sagab6ga (History of the Civil War in England) and printed in his collection of documents of the Puritan Revolution. Their manifesto is partly about this: Dvlo army (TVe saze og She agshu).
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
3) Ranje M. M. Kovalevek (The Founders of English Radicalism), and then G. Jellinek, in this original feature of the Leveler teaching, see an anticipation of the originality of the American political system, which consists in recognizing as unconstitutional laws that violate the liberties of citizens.
“I look at the House of Commons,” writes Lilborn, as the supreme government of Australia; in its hands it concentrates the power inherent in the people, and, without fail, members of the chamber do not have the right to act arbitrarily, following solely their own wishes, but must adhere to the fundamental laws and customs of the country.”
4) Lilborn refers to “Masbpa sVasha IBetzai.”
Already among the Independent Levellers the idea creeps in that the church is the work of human hands. Kvekeri went to dalfe. They criticized the historical monuments and tenets of Christianity. And the Gospel itself was not given an absolute source of religion, pointing to the fluidity and corruption of religious forms. In general, the form of relimi is dflo individual. Even the Lord's Prayer was inclined to be viewed by the English sectarians as a model of prayer, but not as a proper form of prayer. However, the Bible has always remained a dark code of religious and moral teachings, around which, in every free time, the English family grouped. supporting the spirit of Puritanism. But already this direct appeal to the source of religious traditions, with all the respect for him, the radically minded Umamt gave a lot of food for the peculiar interpretation of St. pissing. But the development of positive knowledge 1), from the time of Bacon, scientists and philosophers begin to use them to destroy their religious doubts. And little by little, your pursuit and interpretation of religious dogmas moved to the soil of rational thinking, aided by observation and experience of religion among other peoples. Such a rational current in the religious area, open to the world only one belief and feeling, contributed to the development of the deistic trend *) and the formation of the so-called natural religions, a sister to the doctrine of natural morality. This path and teaching about legality also gradually freed itself from theological guidance 3) and led to
1) NatpayekK. Rosshepaese (1.215) believes that Catholicism itself made an attempt to reconcile what we know and what we are lying about.
2) Veyoio May Brown.
3) Take a look at the old church point of view in ethics, and then it will become clear what is more important than ethics as a basis for individualism.
eo rex
— 237 finally to the idea of the possibility of the same ethical self-determination of the individual, by the properties of his nature, which was carried out in religions by the individualistically minded, above-considered, religionists. radicals.
No matter how significant the successes of naturalism and its philosophies were, they were still not enough for the construction of natural morality, which fell to the lot of positivism and Darvivism.
Therefore, ethics moving away from theology is permeated, with few exceptions, by rationalism and intellectualism. The impetus was given by the methodologist of Descartes, the English utilitarian moralist of the philosophy of Bacon.
Descartes proclaimed the principle of mental egalitarianism among people. Every person, in his opinion, has enough intelligence to start thinking about the Russian Federation and life. All that's missing is the way,
The basis of moral law in religion. It is justified and supported by the authority of the church.