Grotsi joins the tyranomachus at this point, when we insist on curbing absolutism" with the requirements of natural law and "recognize" for "subjects of political and civil freedom. As for the last days,
1) Be pi. B. as swarm T. G. 3. UI.
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
3) Explaining his thought, Grotsy quotes Seneca: Eb 8 ratepdit 11 ototriz paradise, 11 eo po ragepish, po e Nefig per rabeg 81. p: 350 and 351 citations. ed. op. Groshcha.
a =. d lion sobbing ^,
— 261 then a penny is meant, mainly. recognized from the outside. the sovereign and the inviolability of private property.
Thus, in the doctrines of Hugo Grosch, some elements of political individualism are already outlined; In further development, having learned about natural rights, they acted much sharper and more straightforwardly. We tried to highlight these elements artificially. They correspond to the basic tone of the new philosophy of law, the father of which Groszczy is considered to be, although they lose their primacy meaning, “yielding to traditional views, which are far from alien” to the same Groszczy as a monarchist.
We think that you will take it to Hugo. Penny to the dormitory schools can not be done, because he is a typical representative of the organic. looking at the state, dissolving the concept of self-determination of the individual. The principle of sociability is a sign or one of the properties of personality. The human personality, after all, is the political unit that Groszczy primarily analyzes. Its properties explain the hostel. I. this. show in memory the turn that has taken place in the philosophy of the state, in comparison with previous periods.
Rousseau has the right to express, from his point of view, that he blames Grotio for the fact that, according to Grosch, the people are free to submit to the absolute power of the monarch. But Groshchy discovers this great wealth of the principles of private and public law, which remained with him, and with some of the former philosophers, under the weight of the medieval feudal view, for he argues his argument with reference to a free man going into slavery 1).
(T.. Ts. Sh). But on the other hand, we must not lose sight of the fact that with all its moderation, it is not a penny to perceive also some of the liberal principles of the tyranmachs,
1) Rousseau expresses the same negative attitude towards the same idea in Pufendorf.
for la,
= 960 these first, one might say, teachers of political individualism, Grosch could seem to Rousseau, who viewed the philosopher outside the historical perspective and without a general analysis of his doctrine, as an absolutist. But if we abstract from the dogmatic point of view, compare Grosch’s doctrine with any of the doctrines of his contemporaries, especially if we compare Grosch’s thoughts on the limitation of absolutism with the same ones, for example. in Bossuet!), then, on the basis of their differences, I can best show that the Genevan state presented its predecessor in a unilateral consecration before posterity.
Despite ‘despite’ Bossuet’s commitment to autocracy and he called absolute power hateful and barbaric (fatrage ‘its o@eize. A. Ts. R. G. Oya was naive to think that in France “1st sopuegpešel® attache p’u a roi 4e tsets”. He demanded recognition of the rights of civil liberty and property) °).
It is characteristic that Bossuet is motivated by the application of such epithets to absolutism.
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
If the sovereign violates God’s law, then everyone must obey the skorfa of God, bfm the sovereign oh
1) Geiv s’ezyo 1e tshopatase. Whoops. op. 1, no. UG, ag G. rgor. G.
2) G. USH. ate. 2. Although the same Boesuet speaks out against the enormous wealth of plutocrats, decrying their perniciousness on the basis of the Gospel (see his Zegtaop8).
3) On the other hand, both the responsibility of the sovereign and the limitation of his power in the interests of his subjects and the welfare of the people—all this is based on religious and moral, rather than legal premises for the monarch. (Vozz. T,. 1U 15). This rise is characteristic in comparison with the natural law doctrine, which created the philosophical basis precisely for legal premises, on the one hand, establishing the rights of subjects, and on the other, the restrictions of absolutism. In the field of real facts, the history of tosud. the right to mark accordingly these returnees the dominance of enlightened absolutism and bureaucratic monarchy, on the other hand, the so-called rule of law state.
About IVO
yyy ah